History Revisited…

October 15, 2008

Tomorrow, October 16th, I celebrate my 43rd birthday.   In the spirit of remembrance, I thought I would share some of the more whacked-out events, headlines and personal experiences of the past 43 years.   Perhaps you can add some of your own once you’ve finished reading these.

 

In 1965:

o       Cost of a first-class stamp was $.05

o       The Sound of Music premiered

o       Malcolm X was murdered at a Harlem rally

o       Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson’s discovery of cosmic background radiation confirmed the “Big Bang” theory

o       Christopher A. Clouse was born, six weeks later his mother, Bonnie Sue, died during exploratory surgery

 

In 1971:

o       26th Amendment to US Constitution lowered voting age to 18

o       Jim Morrison dies in Paris at the age of 27

o       Intel introduces the microprocessor

o       Bridge Over Troubled Water by Simon and Garfunkel was voted song, record and album of the year.

o       Federal debt was 408.2 billion dollars

o       Candace D. Yeager was born, 32 years later she became my wife

 

In 1984:

o       Ronald Reagan was re-elected in a landslide victory, receiving 59% of votes

o       Cost of a first-class stamp was $.20

o       John McEnroe defeated Jimmy Connors for the Wimbledon title

o       The Cosby Show debuts on NBC

o       Mary Lou Retton, USA, won gold in the women’s All-Around competition

o       Christopher A. Clouse graduated from High School

 

In 1988:

o       CD’s outsell vinyl records for the first time

o       Ted Turner starts Turner Network Television (TNT)

o       France and China permit use of morning after birth-control drug RU486

o       US Navy ship shoots down Iranian airliner in Persian Gulf, mistaking it for a jet fighter; killing 290 passengers

o       Ashley Rene Clouse, my daughter, was born in Jonesboro, Arkansas

 

In 1991:

o       Boris Yeltsin becomes first freely elected president of Russian Republic

o       Anita Hill accuses Judge Clarence Thomas of sexual harassment

o       Unemployment was 6.8%

o       Fox Broadcasting is the first network to permit condom advertising on TV

o       Dances With Wolves received Best Picture Award

o       Gerald Tomas Ratley, Candace’s first-born, was born in Poplar Bluff, Missouri

 

1993:

o       Clinton agrees to compromise on military’s ban on homosexuals

o       Federal agens besiege Branch Davidian religious cult, resulting fire kills 72

o       Two police officers convicted in Los Angeles on civil rights charges in Rodney King beating

o       River Phoenix dies of a drug overdose on Halloween at the age of 23

o       Tears in Heaven by Eric Clapton wins both song and record of the year

o       Billy Garrett Clouse, my son, was born into this world in Memphis, Tennessee

 

1998:

o       President Clinton accused in White House sex scandal, denies allegations of affair with Monica Lewinski

o       Life sentence meted out to Terry Nichols, convicted in Oklahoma City bombing which killed 168

o       Titanic becomes highest-grossing film of all time, raking in more than $580 million domestically

o       An estimated 76 million viewers watched the last episode of Seinfeld

o       FDA approves the male impotence drug Viagra

o       Vaden Keith Robins, Candace’s youngest, was born in Jonesboro, Arkansas

 

2003:

o       Saddam Hussein is captured by American Troops

o       Space shuttle Columbia explodes killing all 7 astronauts

o       Arnold Schwarzenegger elected California governor

o       The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King dominated the box office

o       Finding Nemo grossed more than $340 million

o       Johnny Cash, June Carter Cash, Bob Hope, Gregory Peck, John Ritter and Fred Rogers all pass away

o       Chris and Candace become husband and wife

 

Come back tomorrow and read of events, headlines and such that have occurred on October 16th, the biggest of which has to be MY BIRTH.


Free in Christ — Chapter Six

October 7, 2008

Being one whose Christian experience was born of a very conservative background, I have to admit that much of what is being stated in this book makes me uncomfortable.  Yet, if I am to be totally honest with you and with myself, I must admit that the feelings I am experiencing are directly related to what I have discovered when forced, so to speak, by the words of this book to behold my image in the mirror of truth.  

 

Hook begins the fifth chapter with the following statement: Someone has observed that God has not called us to be lawyers, but lovers.   Interestingly enough, this past Sunday I heard another person state:  God has called us to be witnesses for Him, not prosecuting attorneys or judges.  Then, Hook ends the fifth chapter by stating:  When we look upon the Scriptures as a code of laws and begin trying to interpret them as such, we become lawyers.  Then we become judges of those who do not accept our interpretations.   In so doing, we miss the spirit of the message.

 

Is it possible that in our desire to please God that we have missed the spirit of the message and in so doing become nothing more than modern day Pharisees sitting in judgment of those who do not accept our interpretations?

 

In the fifth chapter he expresses the thought that as lawyers of the Word, we have interpreted the Scriptures as a legal system; we have been inconsistent in our application of principles of interpretation, and we have supported our traditional practices by scholasticism and basically indicates that in so doing we have missed the spirit of the message.

 

I have already admitted to having uncomfortable feelings regarding much of what he states and this is especially true of the fifth chapter.  But, I will also be man enough to admit that I agree with much of what he states in this chapter.  I am also very curious as to how you felt regarding this chapter.   So, please answer the following:

 

How did you feel about his section dealing with our legal approach to interpretation of Scripture?  

 

How did you feel about his comments regarding our inconsistencies in interpreting Scripture and about his specific examples?

 

How did you feel about his section on scholasticism and our approach to Scripture?

 

Do you have anything else you would like to add to our discussion?


Perpetual hope…

October 6, 2008

Like most kids who play baseball, I often dreamed of growing up and playing in the World Series.  When my family relocated to a small town near Hot Springs this dream faded as there was no organized baseball league in the area.

 

At that time in my life our local cable company carried both WGN out of Chicago and WTBS out of Atlanta.   For those who are familiar with the choices – you either rooted for the Braves or the Cubs.   All of my friends were big fans of the Atlanta Braves.   During those years the Braves had some really good teams, but I chose to be different and became a fan of the Cubbies.

 

I didn’t realize at that time in my life that my decision to cheer for the Chicago Cubs would end up being a decision that would span 30 years and counting.  Like the majority of Cub fans, I bleed Cub-blue.   Unfortunately, the years have not been too kind and have left us thinking about the year to come; for as they say in Chicago – there is always next year!   But, one thing you can say about Cub fans is that they are loyal to the end.

 

As Soriano correctly stated, It’s not the best team that wins in the playoffs, it’s the team that plays better.   Last year it was the Arizona Diamondbacks, this year it was the Los Angeles Dodgers; but, next year it could be the Chicago Cubs!

 


Throwing the book…

October 5, 2008

This past Saturday morning while I was channel surfing I came across the commercial advertisement of a local church that stated If you have been thinking about coming to church, we promise we won’t throw the book at you.

 

I don’t know what your first thought was regarding this commercial; but, to be honest, I found it quite humorous and thought it was a great way to deliver their message of acceptance to the community.   However, the more I thought about it the more I couldn’t help wonder how many other lessons we could draw from that commercial.

 

Have we been guilty of throwing the book at people?   Have we excelled at judging others and throwing stones?   Could the church learn to be more receptive of sinners and less ready to judge those involved in sin?  

 

Is it possible that our presentation of the gospel has been more focused on condemning the sinner rather than informing them of the savior?

 

Someone recently stated that we were called to be witnesses for the Lord, not prosecuting attorneys or judges.  

 

What do you think?


Free in Christ — Chapter Five

October 3, 2008

In the fifth chapter of his book Free in Christ Cecil Hook addresses the idea that in certain circumstances there is elasticity in the most absolute laws; indicating that our preoccupation with legal justification has blinded our eyes to this great truth

 

If you can recall from our earlier reviews, this suggestion is consistent with what he stated in chapter two; that our tendency is to emphasize the lawful demand and to minimize or fail to discern the principle behind the command.   In that chapter he challenged us to focus on the principle, suggesting that it is the principle that should rule our conduct rather than the command.

 

Now, before someone objects, Cecil plainly states that we must respect God’s laws.  He suggests that all too often the focus of many is to define all the legalities relating to commands while failing to discern the principles the command was designed to promote.  To Cecil, the principle is broader and greater than the command.

 

So, in the fifth chapter, Cecil asks us to consider the thought that there is something greater than law.   Interestingly enough, he stated there was.

 

In his closing statement he indicated that in Christ we are free to make responsible decisions in the world of men with the assurance that God recognizes our unselfish and loving motives and smile His approval.

 

How do you feel about this chapter?   What do you think of his claim that there is something greater than law?